Re-interventions following appendectomy in children: a multicenter study. / Reintervenciones tras apendicectomía en niños. Estudio multicéntrico.

INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis is the most frequent cause of acute abdomen in children. The objective of this study was to analyze the causes, approach, and results of complications requiring surgery following appendectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of the appendectomies conducted in three third-level institutions from 2015 to 2019 was carried out. Complications, causes, and number of re-interventions, time from one surgery to another, surgical technique used, operative findings at baseline appendectomy according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification, and hospital stay were collected. RESULTS: 3,698 appendicitis cases underwent surgery, 76.7% of which laparoscopically, with 37.2% being advanced (grades II-V of the AAST classification). Mean operating time was 50.4 minutes (49.8 ± 20.1 for laparoscopy vs. 49.9 ± 20.1 for open surgery, p > 0.05), and longer in patients requiring re-intervention (68.6 ± 27.2 vs. 49.1 ± 19.3, p < 0.001). 76 re-interventions (2.05%) were carried out. The causes included postoperative infection (n = 46), intestinal obstruction (n = 20), dehiscence (n = 4), and others (n = 6). Re-intervention risk was not impacted by the baseline approach used (open surgery or laparoscopy, OR: 1.044, 95% CI: 0.57-1.9), but it was by appendicitis progression (7.8% advanced vs. 0.7% incipient, OR: 12.52, 95% CI: 6.18-25.3). There was a tendency to use the same approach both at baseline appendectomy and re-intervention. This occurred in 72.2% of laparoscopic appendectomies, and in 67.7% of open appendectomies. The minimally invasive approach (50/76) was more frequent than the open one (27 laparoscopies and 23 ultrasound-guided drainages vs. 26 open surgeries) (p < 0.05). 55% of obstruction patients underwent re-intervention through open surgery (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Re-intervention rate was higher in advanced appendicitis cases. In this series, the minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or ultrasound-guided drainage) was the technique of choice for re-interventions.

INTRODUCCION: La apendicitis aguda es la causa más frecuente de abdomen agudo en niños. El objetivo de este trabajo es estudiar las causas, abordaje y resultados de las complicaciones que requieren intervención quirúrgica después de la apendicectomía. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de las apendicectomías realizadas en 3 centros de tercer nivel entre 2015-2019. Se recogieron las complicaciones, causas y número de reintervenciones, intervalo entre ambas cirugías, técnica empleada, hallazgos operatorios según la Clasificación de la American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) en la apendicectomía inicial y tiempo de ingreso. RESULTADOS: Se intervinieron 3.698 apendicitis, un 76,7% por vía laparoscópica, encontrando un 37,2% evolucionadas (grado II-V de la clasificación AAST). El tiempo medio quirúrgico fue de 50,4 minutos (laparoscopia 49,8 ± 20,1 vs. laparotomía 49,9 ± 20,1, p > 0,05), superior en aquellos pacientes que requirieron reintervención (68,6 ± 27,2 vs. 49,1 ± 19,3, p < 0,001). Se realizaron 76 reintervenciones (2,05%). Las causas fueron: infección postoperatoria (n = 46), obstrucción intestinal (n = 20), dehiscencia (n = 4) y otras (n = 6). El abordaje inicial no influyó en el riesgo de reintervención (laparotomía o laparoscopia, OR 1,044, IC 95% 0,57-1,9), pero sí el grado de evolución de la apendicitis (7,8% evolucionadas vs. 0,7% incipientes, OR 12,52, IC 95% 6,18-25,3). Hubo una tendencia a reintervenir por el mismo abordaje que la apendicectomía, esto ocurrió en un 72,2% de las apendicectomías laparoscópicas y en un 67,7% de las apendicectomías abiertas. El abordaje mínimamente invasivo (50/76) fue más frecuente que la laparotomía (27 laparoscopias y 23 drenajes ecoguiados frente a 26 laparotomías) (p < 0,05). El 55% de los pacientes obstruidos se reintervinieron por vía abierta (p > 0,05). CONCLUSION: El índice de reintervención fue superior en las apendicitis evolucionadas. En esta serie, el abordaje mínimamente invasivo (laparoscópico o drenaje ecoguiado) fue la técnica de elección en las reintervenciones.

Reintervenciones tras apendicectomía en niños. Estudio multicéntrico / Re-interventions following appendectomy in children: a multicenter study

Introducción: La apendicitis aguda es la causa más frecuente deabdomen agudo en niños. El objetivo de este trabajo es estudiar lascausas, abordaje y resultados de las complicaciones que requieren in-tervención quirúrgica después de la apendicectomía.Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de las apendicectomíasrealizadas en 3 centros de tercer nivel entre 2015-2019. Se recogieronlas complicaciones, causas y número de reintervenciones, intervalo entreambas cirugías, técnica empleada, hallazgos operatorios según la Clasi-ficación de la American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST)en la apendicectomía inicial y tiempo de ingreso.Resultados: Se intervinieron 3.698 apendicitis, un 76,7% por víalaparoscópica, encontrando un 37,2% evolucionadas (grado II-V de laclasificación AAST). El tiempo medio quirúrgico fue de 50,4 minutos(laparoscopia 49,8 ± 20,1 vs. laparotomía 49,9 ± 20,1, p > 0,05), superioren aquellos pacientes que requirieron reintervención (68,6 ± 27,2 vs.49,1 ± 19,3, p < 0,001).Se realizaron 76 reintervenciones (2,05%). Las causas fueron: infec-ción postoperatoria (n = 46), obstrucción intestinal (n = 20), dehiscencia(n = 4) y otras (n = 6). El abordaje inicial no influyó en el riesgo dereintervención (laparotomía o laparoscopia, OR 1,044, IC 95% 0,57-1,9),pero sí el grado de evolución de la apendicitis (7,8% evolucionadas vs.0,7% incipientes, OR 12,52, IC 95% 6,18-25,3).Hubo una tendencia a reintervenir por el mismo abordaje que laapendicectomía, esto ocurrió en un 72,2% de las apendicectomías lapa-roscópicas y en un 67,7% de las apendicectomías abiertas. El abordajemínimamente invasivo (50/76) fue más frecuente que la laparotomía(27 laparoscopias y 23 drenajes ecoguiados frente a 26 laparotomías)(p < 0,05). El 55% de los pacientes obstruidos se reintervinieron porvía abierta (p > 0,05).

Introduction: Acute appendicitis is the most frequent cause ofacute abdomen in children. The objective of this study was to analyzethe causes, approach, and results of complications requiring surgeryfollowing appendectomy.Materials and methods: A retrospective study of the appendecto-mies conducted in three third-level institutions from 2015 to 2019 wascarried out. Complications, causes, and number of re-interventions, timefrom one surgery to another, surgical technique used, operative findingsat baseline appendectomy according to the American Association forthe Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification, and hospital stay werecollected.Results: 3,698 appendicitis cases underwent surgery, 76.7%of which laparoscopically, with 37.2% being advanced (grades II-Vof the AAST classification). Mean operating time was 50.4 min-utes (49.8 ± 20.1 for laparoscopy vs. 49.9 ± 20.1 for open surgery,p > 0.05), and longer in patients requiring re-intervention (68.6 ± 27.2vs. 49.1 ± 19.3, p < 0.001).76 re-interventions (2.05%) were carried out. The causes includedpostoperative infection (n = 46), intestinal obstruction (n = 20), dehis-cence (n = 4), and others (n = 6). Re-intervention risk was not impactedby the baseline approach used (open surgery or laparoscopy, OR: 1.044,95% CI: 0.57-1.9), but it was by appendicitis progression (7.8% ad-vanced vs. 0.7% incipient, OR: 12.52, 95% CI: 6.18-25.3).There was a tendency to use the same approach both at baseline ap-pendectomy and re-intervention. This occurred in 72.2% of laparoscopicappendectomies, and in 67.7% of open appendectomies. The minimallyinvasive approach (50/76) was more frequent than the open one (27laparoscopies and 23 ultrasound-guided drainages vs. 26 open surger-ies) (p < 0.05). 55% of obstruction patients underwent re-interventionthrough open surgery (p > 0.05).

El bazo pediátrico no traumático. Valoración por imagen / Non-traumatic spleen disorders in children. Assessment by imaging

Para la mayoría de radiólogos y pediatras, el bazo es el "órgano olvidado", a pesar de estar afectado en múltiples situaciones clínicas de la infancia. Mientras que en el traumatismo abdominal pediátrico es el órgano más implicado, la patología esplénica no traumática es menos conocida. El bazo se visualiza bien mediante cualquier técnica de imagen: ecografía, tomografía computarizada, resonancia magnética, y de ellas, la primera es la más utilizada en niños. Conocer las características por imagen de las anomalías esplénicas, tanto congénitas como adquiridas, permite realizar una aproximación diagnóstica correcta, evitar procedimientos quirúrgicos o biopsias innecesarias y guiar al clínico hacia un tratamiento adecuado. Nuestro objetivo es mostrar el comportamiento del bazo en edad pediátrica con las diferentes técnicas de imagen: su anatomía normal, las principales variantes anatómicas y la patología esplénica no traumática más frecuente, correlacionando con clínica, serología o histología

The spleen is considered a "forgotten organ" by most radiologists and paediatricians despite being affected in many clinical paediatric situations. While it is the organ most often affected in paediatric abdominal trauma, non-traumatic spleen disorders are less well known. The spleen is well visualised by any imaging technique: ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); the former is used most often in children. Using imaging techniques to determine the features of splenic anomalies, both congenital and acquired, enables a correct diagnostic approach, avoids unnecessary surgical procedures or biopsies, and helps the clinician to prescribe appropriate treatment. Our aim was to show the behaviour of the spleen in children using the different imaging techniques: its normal anatomy, the principal anatomical variants and the most common spleen disorder correlating with clinical symptoms, serology and histology

[Use of lipofilling in pediatric patients]. / Aplicaciones de autoinjerto graso en pacientes pediátricos.

OBJECTIVE: To Present the benefits of free autologous fat grafts in different pathologies of children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study was performed on 18 patients who received a treatment with an autologous fat graft during the 2009-2012 period. The surgical technique consisted in removing fat from a donor region, processing the fat in order to purify it by centrifugation and grafting injection. The following variables were analysed: age, sex, pathology, complications of the technique, visual aspects results, subjective results (by rating satisfaction from 1-4 in examination room, and by telephone), donor sites and number of sessions. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were studied. Eleven patients had scars (2 were burn sequelae, 8 were side effects of a previous surgery and 1 was postraumatic), 2 patients had breast asymmetry, 1 patient had bilateral breast agenesis and 4 patients had facial asymmetries (Parry-Romberg syndrome in 2 cases, Treacher-Collins and monorhinia). There were no complications with the surgical technique except for fat resorption in 11 patients that needed a new reinjection. All patients with scar sequelae showed considerable improvement. The patients with breast pathology, experienced objective improvement, with practically full symmetry and natural aesthetics. Three to four patients affected by facial asymmetry, achieved good results in contour and symmetry. In order to obtain optimal results, 7 of the patients required just one session and the rest of patients, needed more sessions. The donor area was the abdominal region in 12 patients and the calf region in 6. Similar results were achieved regardless of the donor area. The assessment of patient satisfaction showed these results: very satisfied in 12 patients, satisfied 4 patients, scarcely satisfied 2 patienst and no one was not satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the use of autologous fat grafts is feasible in the pathologies mentioned previously due to the technical simplicity, the good cosmetic results and the absence of complications in our series.